Disclaimer: The information contained on this site is for information purposes only, and may not apply to your situation. The author, publisher, distributor and provider provide no warranty about the content or accuracy of content enclosed. Information provided is subjective. Keep this in mind when reviewing this guide. Neither the Publisher nor Author shall be liable for any loss of profit or any other commercial damages resulting from use of this guide.  All links are for information purposes only and are not warranted for content, accuracy, or any other implied or explicit purpose.

 

THE LIES BEHIND THE SUSPENSION OF RON BOMBLISS OF KESANG CAMP'S TIBETAN MASTIFFS. THE FOLLOWING WAS PUBLICLY POSTED ON THIS INDIVIDUAL FRIEND'S HATE AND SLANDER FB PAGE. Here is a lawsuit to a similar case. Cut and paste the following link: http://asgw2016.com/background/akc-corruption/

The only difference in my opinion between this and the Kesang Camp suspension is that the accuser is some unemployed scavenger; who is very good at getting people to believe them. What do you call this? This is the type of behavior that has made me come to my decision that I do not want to part of an organization that treats good, decent, people this way. One that seems to promote it with it's policies and decisions.

M R
J , you know NOTHING. You have not talked to me about Sbow. NO ONE in your group has talked to
me about Sbow. You make stuff up based on ZERO information.

(I WAS A WITNESS) IS THAT WHY YOU ARE SLANDERING ME?

You think Silkbow was “murdered” because Ron says so? How does he know? He has not had any concern for
Sbow since the day I rescued him from that hell hole.
Ron lies on a regular basis about our agreement in regards to Sbow.

(READ CAREFULLY THE AGREEMENT IN HER OWN WORDS - EXCEPT THAT SHE WAS NOT TO HAVE SILKBOW SIGNED OVER BECAUSE RON HAD TWO LITTERS ON THE WAY AND AS SHE WRITES IN HER OWN WORDS; IT WAS ONLY A ONE TIME LITTER) WHAT BREEDER SELLS A DOGS WITH UNLIMITED BREEDING RIGHTS FOR $1000.00? ANY BREEDER WHO IS BEING HONEST; KNOWS THAT THIS WAS A FAR FETCHED STATEMENT.

I had two choices, to use Silkbow as a stud for K and the charge was 2000.00
OR
I could buy Silkbow for 1000.00 use him once and retire him as a stud dog and make his life comfortable for the
rest of his life.

(SO WHY WOULD YOU NEED THE PAPERS IN YOUR NAME FOR A ONE TIME SHOT - PARDON THE PUN.)

While I was trying to decide what I wanted to do, Ron called me and told me he was going to shoot Sbow if I did
not take him. Ron said he had been fence fighting again and had injured his mouth and he was not taking him to
the Vet again for this unless I would take him.
He told me that Silkbow had broken all of his teeth from “fence fighting”. Who letʼs their dog fence fight to the
point they break off their teeth????

HMM, WASN'T THAT THE POINT OF HIM RE HOMING HIM WITH YOU? HE WAS "SUPPOSED" TO BE IN A HOME WITH NO OTHER MALES TO FIGHT WITH. YOU AGREED TO THAT AND YOU WROTE IT IN THIS POST.


He also said that Sbowʼs “jaw was hanging”.

WHERE IS YOUR EVIDENCE THAT HIS MOUTH WAS HANGING? SURELY, YOU WOULD HAVE TAKEN HIM TO THE VET? AND THERE WOULD BE A RECORD OF THIS?


It seemed that I had no choice. I was not going to let Sbow be shot and I was not going to let him suffer.
My son, M and I went to pick up Sbow. Ron was paid in full 1000.00 for Sbow. He was also paid
500.00 for a deposit on a puppy.

RON HAD ONLY HAD SILKBOW FOR ONE YEAR PRIOR TO THIS AGREEMENT. HE WAS SOLD AS A PUPPY AND THE MAN HAD GOTTEN SICK AND NO LONGER COULD KEEP HIM. RON DROVE OUT EAST TO PICK UP THREE DOGS FROM THIS MAN. THE MAN HAD KEPT HIM MUZZLED SO HOW COULD RON HAVE DONE ALL THIS DAMAGE? WHY WOULD RON HAVE SPENT MONEY AT THE VET TO HEAL SILKBOW? IS THIS MAKING SENSE TO YOU?

While I was at Ronʼs he told me that he kept his dogs in line by hitting them with PVC pipe and I did see pieces of
PVC pipe that could be used for that purpose on his property. He also told me he urinates on his dogs to keep
them in line. He also told me (and other people have told me he told them this as well) if he has any leftover
puppies that on their one year birthday, he shoots them and buries them in a hole on his property. Yes, I have
reported this.

YOU REPORTED THIS? WHERE IS THE POLICE REPORTS AND WHAT DID THEY SHOW?
IN YOUR OWN WORDS BELOW! MY VERBAL AGREEMENT WITH RON THAT "I" NOT YOUR SON, COULD BREED SBOW TO K "ONCE"!


My VERBAL agreement with Ron that I could breed Silkbow to K once

and then he was to be retired. I was
to have Sbow registered in my name.

IT WAS NEVER MY UNDERSTANDING HE WAS TO BE SIGNED OVER. IT WAS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT RON HAD TWO LITTERS ON THE WAY; HE WOULD SIGN OFF ON ONE LITTER AND THEN SBOW WAS TO RETIRE WITHOUT ANY OTHER MALE DOGS AROUND TO FIGHT WITH.

Ron did not give me Sbowʼs AKC registration papers, stating he was expecting litters of puppies by Sbow and
he would send Sbowʼs AKC registration papers after he registered his litters.
Ron is correct when he says we agreed I would rehome K. I regret agreeing to such a stipulation. Had I
thought it through I would have realized it was not a practical on many levels.
I did rehome K, but K was not adjusting to his new home and he was returned to me. There was no
problem, everyone was happy, so I saw no reason to attempt to place K in another home.
Ron and I “fell out” after K was bred. Buyer beware, learn from my experience. NEVER do transactions
without a written and signed agreement and never leave without registration papers in hand.
Ron and I were in contact almost daily during K heat cycle and discussed the AIʼs that occurred. Ron was
December 6 at 5:33pm
aware that K and Silkbow were being bred AI by my Vet.

I THOUGHT A VET IS REQUIRED GET THE SIGNATURE OF THE STUD DOG OWNER ?????????? I WOULD HAVE THOUGHT THE VET WOULD HAVE ASKED FOR PROOF OF OWNERSHIP OR A SIGNATURE? WEIRD?

The DAY AFTER K last AI, Ron started calling and leaving very unpleasant messages. He then began
emailing me, telling me that it was his understanding that K had been returned to me and that I now owed him
an additional 1000.00 for breaking our agreement. He said he would not send me the registration papers for
Sbow so I could get him registered in my name

REALLY? ARE ANY OF YOUR DOGS REGISTERED IN YOUR NAME? YOU SAID YOU CAN'T HAVE ANYTHING IN YOUR NAME. WHY WAS HE REGISTERED IN YOUR SON'S NAME? HE WASN'T SUPPOSED TO HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH SBOW BECAUSE OF WHAT YOU TOLD MANY PEOPLE HE WANTED TO DO TO YOUR DOGS BECAUSE THEY YOU NEEDED TO START ALL OVER WITH NEW DOGS. WHY DO YOU TELL PEOPLE THINGS LIKE YOU DO; IF THEY ARE ONLY JOKES OR NOT TRUE?

and register my puppies until I paid him. And the price kept
going UP !

He NEVER ONCE ASKED IF SBOW WAS OK. (HMM, YOU WOULD NOT RETURN HIS CALLS OR EMAILS. I ASKED YOU ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS TO CALL HIM AND "WORK IT OUT". )

HE NEVER ONCE ASKED WHAT LIVING ARRANGMENTS I
HAD FOR K AND SBOW. HE NEVER ONCED ASKED IF THEY WERE GETTING ALONG.
ALL HE COULD TALK ABOUT WAS ME GIVING HIM MORE
MONEY. At one point he demanded $5000.00!!!!!!!
Once he talked about returning Silkbow. I was not going to take Sbow back to that hell hole where his death by
shooting had been threatened!!!!
AND I refused to let Ron extort money not due him from me.
I called AKC and found out that if there was a dispute, I could file a paper litter application and explain why the
person the stud dog was registered to had not signed the papers and provide any documentation I had about
what the issue. (EXCEPT NOTHING IS IN YOUR NAME. WHY? YOUR SON WAS NEVER PART OF ANY AGREEMENT)
I did this. I sent them Ronʼs nasty emails stating I owed him more money, etc. AKC registered my litter.
Little did I know they missed a step. They were supposed to talk to Ron about why he would not sign the papers.
So my litter registration was put on hold and Ron, because he could see he was not going to get any more money
began to make my life a living hell in attempt to bullying me into paying him moʼ money.
It started with on line harassment on his FB page stating I/my son had signed his name on a litter registration (a
lie) and continued lies about our agreement and the events that had transpired. He delaying my litter registration
by not answering AKC in a timely manner and then challenging the sire of the litter, even though he knew all
about the AIs and when they happened. He has told people I have Sbowʼs semen frozen based on a joke M
heard between my son

A JOKE? SO WHY DIDN'T YOU JUST CALL HIM OR EMAIL HIM LIKE I ASKED YOU TO DO AND STRAIGHTEN IT OUT? WHY? INSTEAD YOU CHOSE TO PUT ME IN THE MIDDLE OF THIS; A PLACE I NEVER WANTED TO BE AND THEN YOU LIED ABOUT ME WITH VICIOUS SLANDER JUST FOR SAYING WHAT I HEARD WHICH I KNEW WAS NEVER PART OF THE AGREEMENT. IF YOU WERE NOT PLANNING TO USE HIS SEMAN AND SELL IT WHY WOULD YOU NEED THE PAPERS? IN YOUR OWN WORDS; HE WAS ONLY TO SIGN OFF ON ONE LITTER. WHY ARE YOU AND YOUR FRIENDS SLANDERING ME PUBLICLY? I THINK IT IS BECAUSE I JUST TOLD RON WHAT I HEARD YOU SAY AND NOW YOU WANT TO SLANDER ME FOR IT. ALL YOU HAD TO DO; WAS CALL HIM BUT THE FACT YOU WOULD NOT SPEAKS VOLUMES.


and I. I do not and never have frozen Sbowʼs semen! He told an on line magazine lies

ONLINE LIES ABOUT YOU. LIKE THE LIES YOU AND YOUR FRIENDS HAVE CONSTANTLY TOLD ABOUT OTHERS?

about me and made them believe he had filed a lawsuit. He NEVER filed a lawsuit against me. I never received
anything from the court.
FYI ……. the online magazine removed the article when it was mentioned that the “court papers” had no docket
number.

LIKE YOUR FRIEND WHO EMAILED THE EDITOR PRETENDING TO BE RON AND MAKING UP YOUR LIES ABOUT ME?

He lied about K having Addisonʼs, even involving C “whatever her last name is this week” to say that
Queso had Addisonʼs. However, C would never allow my Vet to talk to Quesoʼs Vet about the diagnosis.
She played ring around the rosy until her Vetʼs staff directly told me that C had instructions placed on
Quesoʼs file that NO INFORMATION WAS TO BE RELEASED TO ANYONE.
I suspect Queso was NOT tested for Addisonʼs. I suspect he had a severe case of whipworms, which mimics
Addisonʼs symptoms. Why do I believe this? Because she wonʼt allow a discussion between Vets and K had
whipworms when she I got her as a puppy, from the same housing where Queso was at the
time.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3118290/
Her unethical lack of sharing of ACCURATE health information caused me to spend a lot of money testing my
dog who had NO SYMPTOMS for Addisonʼs based on these lies told by Ron and C “whatʼs her name this
week”. K DOES NOT HAVE ADDISONʼS!!

AN ADDISON'S DISEASE TEST WILL ONLY BE POSITIVE IF THE DOG HAS "ACTIVE" ADDISONS. THERE IS NO TEST TO DETERMINE IF THEY WILL GET ADDISONS ACCORDING TO ARTICLES ON THE WEB ABOUT IT. ARTICLES ALSO STATE IT USUALLY SHOWS UP IN MIDDLEAGE FEMALE DOGS.

Silkbow? A mistrustful dog came to my home. Gradually he began to trust me and to even play with me. He was
happy and content. He was loved and well cared for.
Sbowʼs mental status began to change not long before his tenth birthday. My Vet diagnosed him with
“dementia”. Perhaps it was all of those blows to the head with the PVC pipe. Sbow had become dangerous and
I had to make the decision let him go. He died in my arms during a humane euthanasia performed by my Vet.
I find J accusations that I “murdered” Sbow to be cruel and heartless and have no basis other than in
J and Ronʼs fantasies. If anything other than old age caused Silkbowʼs dementia it was Ron by beating that
dog with PVC pipe.

AGAIN, RON HAD ONLY HAD SILKBOW FOR ONE YEAR PRIOR TO THIS AGREEMENT. HE WAS SOLD AS A PUPPY AND THE MAN HAD GOTTEN SICK AND NO LONGER COULD KEEP HIM. RON DROVE OUT EAST TO PICK UP THREE DOGS FROM THIS MAN. THE MAN HAD KEPT HIM MUZZLED SO HOW COULD RON HAVE DONE ALL THIS DAMAGE? WHY WOULD RON HAVE SPENT MONEY AT THE VET TO HEAL SILKBOW? IS THIS MAKING SENSE TO YOU?

So J , you donʼt know shit and I am sick of all of you, who also donʼt know shit.
I am tired of trying to keep my head down so you all will not notice me and send M to my house.
She has been there three times that I know of and one of the times I believe she poisoned K.

THIS IS THEIR STANDARD M.O. WHEN THEY LIE ABOUT SOMETHING AND ARE QUESTIONED THEY MAKE UP LIES AND "SLANDER" OTHERS. THIS IS DISGUSTING LIE BY THIS WOMAN HER FRIENDS WHO SAY NOW I "NEED A BULLET". WHY KIND OF PERSON SAYS THAT?


I had to send
K away because of my fear that she would be killed by being poisoned.
M even went to my neighbors told them that I was dog fighting and asked if they had heard it! I think she lives
in some other dimension!!!

OR WAS "K" IN DANGER OF BEING PUT DOWN AS YOU SAID YOUR SON WANTED TO DO? QUOTE: "THEY HAD MY SON SO UPSET HE WAS GONNA HAVE THE DOGS PUT TO SLEEP BECAUSE OF THE CRAP THEY WERE TALKING TELLING HIM WE JUST NEEDED TO START OVER WITH NEW DOGS." UNQUOTE WHAT YOU TOLD ME AND OTHERS ABOUT WHAT HE WANTED TO DO IS VERY DISTURBING AND I WILL REFRAIN FROM POSTING IT HERE. WHY WOULD YOU SAY SUCH THINGS ABOUT YOUR SON AND THEN SEND RON THIS X-RAY? YOU CONTINUED TO SLANDER ME SAYING I WAS TRYING TO STEAL SILKBOW. FALSE. I NEVER WANTED SILKBOW. I WILL NEVER HAVE SILKBOW IN ANY OF MY PEDIGREES. DID IT EVER OCCUR TO YOU THAT SENDING RON AN X-RAY AFTER TELLING HIM WHAT A FAMILY MEMBER WANTED TO DO TO YOUR DOGS; MIGHT HAVE MADE HIM WORRIED ABOUT HIS WELFARE? WHY WOULD YOU EVEN TELL PEOPLE THAT KIND OF STUFF? WHY WOULD YOU SEND X-RAYS OF YOUR DOG WITH BUCKSHOT LODGED ALL OVER INSIDE OF HIM?


A COPY OF THE X-RAY YOU SENT SHOWS BUCKSHOT ALL OVER THE DOG'S HEAD AND JAW. THIS XRAY WAS FORWARDED TO ME AND I CAN PROVIDE TO ANYBODY INTERESTED IN KNOWING THE TRUTH.

YOUR ALSO STATED YOUR DOGS ARE SERVICE DOGS, CERTIFIED BY A KENNEL WHO RESPONDED THAT THEY DO NOT CERTIFY SERVICE DOGS WHEN EMAILED. WHY SHOULD I BELIEVE ANYTHING YOU SAY?

YOU SAID QUOTE: "I am tired of trying to keep my head down so you all will not notice me" UNQUOTE. WELL I AM TIRED OF YOUR LIES ABOUT ME AND WHAT HAPPENED. I FIND YOU AND YOUR GROUP OF FRIENDS QUITE DISGUSTING. BLAMING OTHERS FOR THE DEATHS OF YOUR DOGS? YOU AND YOUR GROUP ARE SICK AND WHAT YOU DID TO HAVE SOMEBODY WHO HAS SPENT MUCH OF THEIR LIVES DEVOTED TO THIS BREED IS IRRESPONSIBLE AND UNFORGIVEABLE. I DON'T BELIEVE A WORD YOU SAY BASED ON MY OWN PERSONAL EXPERIENCES WITH YOU AND YOUR FRIENDS WHOM
I HAVE NEVER MET! THEY SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF THEMSELVES FOR REPEATING THE SLANDEROUS LIES YOUR SPEW ABOUT PEOPLE THEY HAVE NEVER MET. YOU, YOUR FRIENDS, AND WHAT THEY HAVE DONE HAVE MADE ME NEVER WANT TO BE PART OF THE AKC. ALL THIS STUFF IS VERY DISTURBING BEHAVIOR AND PRETTY CRAZY IN MY OPINION.

TIBETAN MASTIFF PUPPY AND AKC SHOW BREEDERS - AKC REGISTRATION FRAUD

WHY I BELIEVE AKC IS A WASTE OF MONEY AND A BIG SCAM

BREEDER OF MERIT? WHAT EXACTLY IS IT? BASED ON MY OBSERVATIONS; A BREEDER OF MERIT IS SOMEBODY WHO FUNNELS HOARDS OF REGISTRATIONS INTO THE AKC, REGARDLESS OF ACCUARACY OR THE HEALTH OF THE DOGS. (AKC DOES NOT REQUIRE HEALTH TESTING IN ORDER TO REGISTER)

My friend and breeder of my Kesang Camps Tika has been targeted and retaliated by the AKC in my opinion for the actions of some very dishonest, unscrupulous, money hungry want to be breeders. They got his dogs by using "puppy brokers" because he would not sell to them and told the AKC all kinds of outrageous lies about him. Now these same people have targeted me because I only want to expose their deceptive and dishonest business practices. Here is another example of a lawsuit filed against the AKC. You can read about it here by cutting and pasting this link: http://asgw2016.com/akc-charter-and-by-laws/ This is how they intimidate people. These are my opinions based on my experiences with these highly unethical individuals.

IS AKC A SCAM? DO A SEARCH AS THESE ARE JUST A FEW OF THE ARTICLES I HAVE FOUND!

HERE ARE SOME LINKS:

PUPPY MILLS?

REGISTRATION FRAUD?

FRAUD?

ABOUT AKC INSPECTED KENNELS

AKC AND PUPPY MILLS

AKC: THE PUPPY MILLS CHAMPION?

PUPPY MILLS?

AKC AND PUPPY MILLS?

THE BEST DOG DOESN'T ALWAYS WIN

QUOTE FROM ARTICLE DIRECTLY ABOVE: quote "Basically, the AKC certification boasted by breeders around the country is no more than a meaningless piece of paper that just about any breeder can buy, regardless of the conditions in which their dogs are kept and raised.

Not only is the AKC certification meaningless, the American Kennel Club is actually going to great lengths to protect these types of breeders. Instead of working with animal advocacy groups to improve the lives of these dogs, the AKC has fought in opposition of stricter laws and increased inspections for breeders.

It is beyond sad that one of the oldest, most well-known dog advocacy organizations, founded on a mission to promote responsible ownership and protect dogs, is not only doing too little to put an end to puppy mills themselves, but they are fighting other advocacy groups that are trying to help.

If you are looking for a purebred dog of your own, find a breeder that you can visit with, that will show you their kennels and breeding dogs. Do not buy a puppy online, from a pet store, or through some other means where you can’t see exactly where the dog is coming from and how they are cared for. Not only would you be supporting the heinous practices going on in these puppy mills, but you’re likely to end up with a very sick little dog on your hands.

Instead, find a reputable breeder in your area and visit their kennels before deciding to make a purchase. Better yet, look for the specific breed you’re interested in through local shelters and rescue organizations." UNQUOTE

DOES AN AKC CERTIFICATE OF INSPECTION MEAN ANYTHING? THERE ARE MANY MANY ARTICLES THAT DISPUTE THE CONDITIONS OF AKC INSPECTED KENNELS.

ARTICLE

ARTICLE

AKC INSPECTED KENNELS?

I have no clue why anybody would pay the AKC to determine who owns their dogs without their permission or signature on any whim they get. I think they just look at where the most registrations and money that comes back to them and go with that person regardless of whether they are the "owner of record". I believe an AKC registration paper is more of a liabtility to the rightful owner and that you are better off not registering them at all with AKC.

As an owner when you register your dog with AKC; I believe you are putting them at risk to be stolen. Based on my experiences, AKC DOES determine ownership of dogs even though they say they do not. A dog was transferred by an owner to a person in order for them to get the dog. The owner was concerned for the welfare of his dog since the person who had the dog was not responding to his emails or phone calls. AKC refused to honor the owner of records wishes in the matter which stopped the process. The dog wound up dying. How? Why? I believe the AKC should be held accountable for it's actions and it has never responded to any questions surrounding it's refusal to transfer a dog based on the rightful owner's signature. Why does the AKC refuse to respond? Who knows but it has made me believe that the AKC does not have any interest in the welfare of dogs and only cares about money from registrations and show. I will never register another dog because of what I have seen the AKC do. This tells me that you are basically signing your rights away as the owner of your dog when you register them with AKC. Why whould anybody want to pay for this liability?

On another occasion, AKC targeted a breeder because they were boycotting the organization. They suspended the breeder and then registered a puppy somebody bought from him; even though they themselves had suspended the breeder. The person who bought the puppy was told by the breeder that was not to be registered with the AKC. The person then registered the puppy with the UKC in order to bring it's registration back into the AKC. How can the AKC register a puppy from a breeder who they themselves have suspended. This is how I understood what the person did to get the puppy registered with AKC. When asked, the puppy buyer said they threatened the AKC with a lawsuit. I just can't support what in my opinion is such a R.I.C.O. organization. That is just the way I feel about the AKC. They have shown me that they will not respect me as an owner or enforce their own rules. I think they are only about the money. BE CAREFUL BECAUSE YOU COULD BE ATTACKED BY "ELITIST" AND HIGH VOLUME BREEDERS JUST FOR ASKING QUESTIONS ABOUT HOW YOUR REGISTRATION DOLLARS ARE SPENT. IN THIS INSTANCE, I WAS CURIOUS BECAUSE I WANTED TO KNOW HOW A SUSPENDED BREEDER'S PUPS COULD BE REGISTERED? I WANTED TO KNOW WHAT IF ANY PROTECTIONS I HAVE AS A OWNER FOR GIVING AKC MY MONEY. WHAT MOTIVATES PEOPLE INTO SILENCING OTHERS WHO ARE MERELY CURIOUS ABOUT WHAT THEY ARE SPENDING THEIR MONEY ON? FOLLOW THE AKC MONEY TRAIL AND BEWARE OF THESE BREEDERS WHO WILL ATTACK YOU BECAUSE THEY FEEL THEIR "DOG BUSINESSES" ARE BEING THREATENED. READING THE FOLLOWING MAY GIVE YOU A BETTER UNDERSTANDING:
ABOUT PUPPY MILLS AND AKC

THE HUMANE SOCIETY EXPLAINS

WHY THE AKC FIGHTS FOR PUPPY MILLS

THE LIFE OF A SHOWDOG AND THE POLITICS/MONEY BEHIND THEM

SHOW DOG ADVERTISING | CAMPAIGNING – dvertising-politics_Harper138.asp">Full article Here

quote: "I suggested that a would-be breeder looking for a purebred dog would have to stumble over the fact that there’s a dog show nearby. If a local breeder or family does go there, well, they are going to be disappointed because the dogs are either shut up in big rigs, being prettied up, or they are in the show ring. They can’t be touched and nobody has time to talk. She became thoughtful. I know the look." unquote

The image above shows how these dogs are crated and stacked one on top of another traveling with their handler from show to show across the country. Don't fool yourself, there is tons of money behind these dogs and so called "championships" can be won. Show dogs in my opinion have terrible lives.

With so much money riding on dogs, are you getting what you think? Based on my experiences, I now question whether the dogs pedigree is really what it says, or whether the health tests are really from the dog they say it is. on what I have experienced; show breeders breed for the ring and will resort to anything to get the look. Getting other breeder's lines behind the back door. If you are considering a puppy from an AKC high volume show breeder; make sure to ask for verification through DNA tests, that your puppy is really who they say it is.

Small non AKC show kennels are not concerned with the politics of the show ring; therefore they have less to lose and I believe they are far more honest. There really is no reason for them to behave the way the AKC and it's show breeders do.

BEWARE OF AKC BREEDERS/JUDGES - CORPORATE PUPPY MILLS?

ARE YOU GETTING A BETTER DOG? BASED ON MY EXPERIENCES THE ANSWER IT NO!

Quote from article referenced above:

Quote: "We asked Wayne Pacelle, president and CEO of the Humane Society of the United States: "If I'm looking to buy a dog and I see it has been AKC-inspected, AKC-registered, does that mean I'm getting a good dog?"

"Absolutely not. It really is just a piece of paper without any value for dog welfare," Pacelle told us." UNQUOTE

ARE YOU PUTTING YOUR DOG AT RISK TO BE STOLEN BY REGISTERING THEM WITH AKC?

AKC REGISTRATION FRAUD

THERE ARE COUNTLESS OTHER REASONS BASED ON WHAT I HAVE EXPERIENCED WITH THE AKC SHOW BREEDERS/JUDGES AS TO WHY I DO NOT BELIEVE THE AKC IS A REGISTRY OF INTEGRITY OR THAT THEY ACTUALLY CARE ABOUT THE WELFARE OF THE DOGS. I WILL BE REGISTERING WITH UKC SOLELY BECAUSE THEY ACTUALLY VERIFY THE OWNERS SIGNATURE ON EVER TRANSACTION AND OWNERS ARE REQUIRED TO SHOW THEIR OWN DOGS. SHOWING YOUR OWN DOGS MAKES FOR A MUCH FAIRER VENUE. CHAMPIONSHIPS CANNOT BE BOUGHT.

AKC CORPORATE PUPPY MILLS?

There are many more articles on the subject of the AKC and puppy mills. Just google it! The following are all good questions to ask a potential breeder. Does a breeder have more than one breed? How many litters per year are they producing? Do they require co-ownership agreements in which the co-owner must whelp a litter and give the breeder back one or more puppies? Do they breed puppies for a living? How many dogs do they own? Are they on their property? How many dogs have they owned that died in their possession? How old were dogs when they died? Ask to see the vet reports on dogs that died for potential health issues.

PEDIGREE FRAUD – AKC STUD BOOK? and the list goes on and on.

MAKING THEIR OWN MAJORS - "DEEP POCKETS" AND THE SHOW WORLD - THE SHOW WORLD ILLUSION. I'm thinking Westminster is just about the money?

When a breeder brings enough of their own dogs to a show where they know there is no competition to make their own major and get a championship for their dog. SCAM! DON'T BELIEVE THEIR MARKETING TOOLS! FOLLOW THE AKC MONEY TRAIL.

GETTING THE DOGS IN FRONT OF JUDGES ALL OVER THE COUNTRY - "CAMPAIGNERS" (GREAT ARTICLE EXPLAINS ALL ABOUT "FOLLOWING THE SHOW WORLD MONEY TRAIL!)

This is when a dog goes for months on end to shows all over the country. Doesn't matter if there is any competition because the purpose is for judges all over the country to "get an eye" on the dog and it's "well connected" handler. That way, when Eukanuba or Westminster comes up; the judges will recognize the handler and most likely that dog will win. It's all about following the money!

AKC and their corporate puppy mills. Be very wary of AKC show breeders who require you to breed your puppy in exchange for one or two puppies back. This is what was expected of me with my formerly co-owned girl bred by a large volume breeder in CA. My worst experiences with Tibetan Mastiffs began early with the ownership of my girls from "High Volume" breeders in CA and one in Wi. Big and long time breeders / AKC judges will make deals like this with unsuspecting individuals to hide all the litters they are actually having each year. Many of these breeders have several breeds and breed 3,4. and 5 litters a year as their soul income. These are what I refer to as "AKC corporate puppy mills". Based on my personal experiences; I believe they are breeding for the show ring and not for the health and welfare of the breed. Ask them how many co-owned dogs they have? How many litters between them and their co-owners? How old are the dogs in their possession? How many dogs have died in their possession, at what ages and what was the cause of death? Ask to speak to their vet? (after all, they ask you a lot of questions and you deserve to know about them) How many adult dogs have they placed and do they know their status? How many litters have they produced over the years? Do they breed dogs for a living? Personally, again, based on my own experiences, I would never support an AKC show breeder.

"WHY DOG SHOW ENTRIES ARE DECLINING?"

FOLLOW THE MONEY > THE HANDLERS PAY A FEE TO THE AKC > THE HANDLERS GET CLIENTS WHO PAY SHOW ENTRIES > THE VENDORS COME THE SHOWS > PEOPLE STAY IN HOTELS AND EAT IN RESTAURANTS. HOW LONG DO YOU THINK PEOPLE WOULD PAY A HANDLER $100.00 + TO HANDLE THEIR DOGS IF THEY ARE NOT WINNING? I HAVE NOTICED THAT OVER IN EUROPE PEOPLE HANDLE THEIR OWN DOGS; MAKING IT A MUCH LEVEL VENUE IN MY OPINION.

AKC HANDLERS - EACH HANDLER PAYS A $250.00 TO BE REGISTERED ACCORDING TO THEIR WEBSITE: http://www.akc.org/handlers/links.cfm DO YOU REALLY BELIEVE YOU CAN WIN AGAINST THE MONEY? Here is an example of what AKC handlers may charge:

Best in Show………….……$450
Reserve Best In Show.........$270
Best In Show National…….$470
Best in Specialty…………..$250
Group I.……...………………$95
Group II……....………………$90
Group III………....……………$80
Group IV………...……………$75

FOLLOW THE MONEY TRAIL. IT IS PRETTY CLEAR TO ME. AGAIN, MY OPINION BASED ON MY OBSERVATIONS AND CONVERSATIONS WITH PEOPLE AT SHOWS.

BUYING A DOG UNDER CO-OWNERSHIP IS THE WORST POSSIBLE THING YOU CAN DO BASED ON MY EXPERIENCE WITH THESE BREEDERS. MY CONTRACT WAS BREACHED FOR MERELY SPEAKING WITH SOMEONE THE BREEDER DID NOT LIKE. IF YOU COMPLAIN; TUFF LUCK. TAKE MY ADVICE AND RUN. UNDER ACCORDING TO MY CO-OWNERSHIP I WAS TO BREED TWO LITTERS, GIVE TWO PUPPIES TO THE CO-OWNER AND PAY FOR EVERYTHING, VET, SHOW AND HANDLER FEES. THAT WOULD HAVE TOTALED UP TO APPOX. $7000.00 AND I WOULD HAVE BEEN RESPONSIBLE FOR ANYTHING THAT COULD GO WRONG? SOUND LIKE A GOOD DEAL TO YOU? IT DID NOT TO ME.

OWNER HANDLER DIVISION? IS IT WORTH THE MONEY? - CUT AND PASTE THE FOLLOWING LINK TO READ: http://www.apps.akc.org/classic/ohs/point_scale.cfm

For all of you wondering; do you get points toward an AKC "champion" status by entering in the owner handler division? Why would anybody throw money away like this? It is very insulting to me as to why AKC would assume their membership to be so dumb. This only validates my opinion that the AKC is only in it for the money. Why would anybody give them money to enter shows which have absolutely no value in terms of "championship" points.

Quote:

"AKC National Owner-Handled Series

AKC National Owner-Handled Series Point Scale

Note: AKC National Owner-Handled Series points do not contribute to championship points.
At an individual show a dog earns the cumulative number of AKC National Owner-Handled Series points associated with each placement.
"

Unquote

HEALTH TESTING?

I saw results from a dog that had failed it's health tests on OFA. Once the results were posted (after the dog was two years old) they were changed? How does this happen? According to the OFA, the x-rays are read by three professionals. If the positioning of a dog was not correct; it seems to me that one out of three "professionals" might have noticed it and sent them back to be redone???

I LIKE OTHER BELIEVE THAT AKC "CHAMPIONSHIPS" MEAN NOTHING. WITH THE RIGHT HANDLER AND ENOUGH MONEY ANY DOG CAN WIN. BE SUSPICIOUS OF THOSE WHO DO NOT SHOW THEIR OWN DOGS. THEY PROBABLY WOULD NOT WIN WITHOUT A POLITICALLY CONNECTED HANDLER. I WAS TOLD BY A HANDLER THAT AKC CAME UP WITH A GRAND CHAMPIONSHIP CATEGORY BASICALLY TO KEEP THE MONEY FLOWING AND IF YOU ARE SHOWING YOUR OWN CHAMPION AGAINST A "HANDLER'S DOG" YOU MOST LIKELY WILL NOT WIN. IT'S ALL ABOUT THE MONEY AND NOT THE DOG BASED ON WHAT I HAVE BEEN TOLD AND EXPERIENCED. Be wary of those show breeders who "market" their dogs". Use your eyes! They will go on about a dog's parents and pedigree; but just because a dog had a certain parent does not mean it will be anything like the dog. It all boils down to what you want, not what they try to "sell you". Don't let anybody try to tell you to look for something that really isn't there.

With so much "politics" in showing I cannot really think why anybody would want to enter their dog in a dog show? Based on what I have seen and experienced with all show people it is only about the owner's ego and the money they think it will bring them in the end; not the dog. Seriously, think about what a huge waste of time it is and the fact that Tibetan Mastiffs would much rather be a home, sitting on the couch or in the yard guarding their territory! Why make them do such frivolous activities that they do not even enjoy?

Breeders who are judges? Could politics play a huge part in the AKC? CHAMPIONSHIPSHIPS AND POLITICS. Based on my experiences I believe it is all about the money and those who make it happen. I have seen images that have been photo shopped of Tibetan Mastiffs where the original photo looks nothing like the "enhanced" one. Some show people will do anything to sell their dogs by means of deception. Don't fall for the deceptive "show crowd" who are only interested in "peddling their dogs" any way they can.

Click on link for information about
Tibetan Mastiffs and Tibetan Mastiff Puppies

INFORMATION ON PUPPY MILLS

Cut and paste the following link for a good article about AKC breeder of merit and puppy mills:
http://www.opednews.com/articles/The-AKC-and-Puppy-Mills-by-Suzana-Megles-130502-501.html

STATE PUPPY MILL LAWS - REPORT

Contacting the Tibetan Mastiff Rescue might be a good idea when researching breeders. They may be able to supply you with valuable information regarding lines and health issues that come into rescue.

You can find many puppies all over the INTERNET for a fraction of the price of these AKC show breeders with similar pedigrees. I think smaller kennels who only produce one breed are far better. I find that the small non AKC breeders are far more ethical and honest. As stated below these are my opinions based on my experiences.ple.